Why VAR is ruining football – Technology’s role in helping football referees dates back many years. The real story of VAR began in 2010 when the Royal Netherlands Football Association (KNVB) came up with it as part of their “Refereeing 2.0” project. The first live test took place between PSV and FC Eindhoven in July 2016 after years of development.
The controversial implementation across leagues
VAR’s global rollout showed mixed patterns. Australia’s A-League and America’s MLS led the way in 2017. Germany’s Bundesliga and Italy’s Serie A brought in the technology for the 2017-2018 season. La Liga and France’s Ligue 1 picked up the system in 2018-2019. The Premier League waited longer than other major leagues and started using VAR in the 2019-2020 season.
This scattered approach created problems right away. Each league used the technology differently, which left fans confused during international matches. The Premier League’s decision to watch VAR in other leagues for two years showed the risks of rushing such a big change.
Original promises vs. reality
VAR came with big promises: no more factual errors, better fairness, and more accurate decisions. The International Football Association Board (IFAB) gave its approval for official matches in 2018. Many saw this as a game-changing moment for football officiating.
Things turned out differently. Spain’s referee committee showed that correct decisions went up from 93% pre-VAR to almost 98% post-implementation. This small improvement came with a big price – it disrupted the game’s natural flow and entertainment value. Instead of ending arguments, VAR just changed what people argued about. Ernesto Valverde said it best: “We knew it wouldn’t be the end to the controversy. One day, it’s one person’s turn to complain; the next, it’s someone else’s”.
How betting markets reacted
Betting companies and tipsters adapted quickly to VAR. They created new betting options, including markets for “no VAR” outcomes. Live betting saw major changes as odds kept changing during reviews.
Bookmakers started offering lower odds for penalties and red cards, knowing VAR made these events more common. This reduced value for regular punters. The long waiting times for decisions also forced markets to pause and created wild swings in live betting odds.
A system meant to bring more certainty ended up making betting more unpredictable. Decisions sometimes took minutes to confirm and caused dramatic changes in odds.
The Psychological Impact of VAR on Betting
Image Source: https://pexels.com/
VAR technology has changed how football betting feels psychologically. Punters worldwide now face new emotional challenges. The mental toll from delayed celebrations and increased anxiety has become a big disadvantage of VAR in football.
The agony of overturned celebrations
Goal celebrations are natural emotional outbursts that help both individuals and society. Despite that, VAR disrupts these natural responses. Fans and punters now hold their breath after each goal. They wait anxiously to see if VAR confirms it. This emotional rollercoaster creates unique distress. The joy of celebration can vanish minutes later when a technical review overturns the goal.
Increased uncertainty and decision fatigue
VAR adds more unpredictability to football betting. Every goal needs VAR approval, which leaves punters in constant anxiety. punters get frustrated with delayed decisions, especially during live betting, according to industry experts. The need to stay alert throughout matches leads to mental exhaustion and decision fatigue.
How delayed decisions affect in-play betting psychology
In-play betting creates psychological pressure through its basic features. Quick bet-to-outcome time, small decision windows, and non-stop betting options make it intense. VAR makes these pressures worse. Market stops during reviews take up 45% to 87% of VAR check time. This forces quick decisions under pressure. So in-play punters show higher problem gambling rates and face more gambling-related harm than traditional punters.
The erosion of betting confidence
The betting market’s confidence has taken a hit from VAR, maybe even more than expected. Betting experts suggest waiting for final confirmation before closing positions. This shows how unpredictable the system can be. VAR’s random nature has changed betting habits. Many punters say markets like “first goalscorer” are nowhere near as predictable as before.
What Are the Disadvantages of VAR in Football for Punters
VAR doesn’t just affect emotions – it creates real challenges for football punters by disrupting betting markets. Longer waiting times and inconsistent decisions have changed betting strategies in games of all types.
Extended decision times and market suspensions
VAR reviews take longer than ever. The average check time jumped from 84 seconds in September 2023 to 134 seconds by February 2024. These long interruptions force bookmakers to pause their markets during reviews. These pauses last between 45% and 87% of the total check time. Data from 1,535 matches shows goal checks made markets unavailable for an average of 111 seconds. punters lose opportunities because markets stay closed when odds would normally change the most.
Inconsistent application across competitions
The biggest problem comes from how differently VAR works in various competitions. The FA Cup shows this clearly – VAR only works in games where Premier League teams play at home. The same situations often lead to different outcomes because leagues interpret rules differently. punterscan’t develop reliable strategies because they can’t predict how officials will judge similar plays across different competitions.
The unpredictability of subjective calls
VAR should eliminate mistakes, but it adds new uncertainties through subjective decisions. Handball and offside calls remain controversial even with technology. Of course, Liverpool’s Luis Díaz had a goal wrongly disallowed against Tottenham in 2023. This happened because of poor communication between VAR officials, who later admitted their mistake.
How VAR has changed traditional betting patterns
VAR has changed how people bet on football. More penalties now happen, creating new markets for bettors. Goal markets have become less predictable as disallowed goals affect final scores. Experienced puntersnow wait to see final decisions before closing their bets. Some people completely avoid betting during matches with VAR completely. Smart punters have learned to include VAR’s effects in their strategy, especially for bets on goals, penalties, and red cards.
Hidden Financial Costs of VAR for Punters
VAR has brought more than just frustration and uncertainty. punters face substantial financial costs that hit their wallets hard. These hidden expenses can damage your betting bankroll before you even notice them.
Voided bets and settlement disputes
VAR’s financial effects start with systemic bet voiding. Bookmakers now void any wager made between an incident and the final VAR decision. Yes, goals indeed reversed after review lead to the automatic voiding of all bets placed between scoring and the final call. This practice applies to penalties and red cards too and disrupts betting strategies completely. Bookmakers can take much time to reopen markets and lose millions in wagers due to downtime.
Settlement disputes have become more frequent. These disputes can happen “after the game has been completed” in rare cases. This leaves punters stuck in financial uncertainty for long periods.
Increased bookmaker margins during VAR reviews
Bookmakers use VAR disruptions strategically to boost their profit margins. Markets often reopen with unfavorable odds changes during suspensions. This strategy “may affect profitability if the wrong price, and too much value, is offered to customers while checks are ongoing”.
Market suspensions give bookmakers a clear advantage. They get more time to recalculate odds and cut punters value through “long suspension times, incorrect market prices and prolonged downtimes”.
The rise of VAR-specific betting traps
VAR has created new betting hazards that empty punter bankrolls:
- First goal markets carry extra risk now as VAR decisions can nullify goals and change total goal counts
- Accumulators become more vulnerable since “VAR increases the chances of overturned results, making accumulators riskier”
- Penalty markets show higher odds due to added uncertainty around VAR decisions
Casual puntersfeel these traps’ effects the most. Betting expert Ricardo Santos points out that “bookmakers and puntersneed to adapt to this reality, incorporating the uncertainty that accompanies each VAR review into their strategies”.
Conclusion
VAR promised to make football fairer and more accurate, but it has hurt betting more than it has helped. This technology hasn’t made decisions clearer. Instead, it has made betting more complicated and unpredictable for punterseverywhere.
Betting markets now freeze for up to 134 seconds. Rules differ between competitions. These changes have transformed football betting’s landscape completely. punterscan’t celebrate right away anymore. They must wait anxiously for VAR decisions. Traditional betting methods don’t work like they used to.
Smart bettors have found new ways to adapt, but the costs keep adding up. Canceled bets and disputes over payouts are common now. Bookmakers increase their margins during VAR checks, which cuts into profits. On top of that, new VAR-related betting traps put both casual and seasoned puntersat risk.
Knowing these challenges helps puntersmake smarter choices. The technology behind VAR keeps changing, and punters need to watch how these changes affect betting markets. They must adapt their strategies to stay ahead. Here is a set of 5 rephrased FAQs based on the article content and provided questions/answers:
FAQs
Q1. How has VAR impacted the flow and enjoyment of football matches?
VAR has disrupted the natural flow of matches and reduced spontaneous celebrations. Fans now have to wait for VAR confirmation before fully celebrating goals, which has diminished some of the excitement. The technology has also led to more stoppages and delays, with an average suspension time of 111 seconds following goal checks.
Q2. What are some of the main criticisms of VAR in football?
Key criticisms include extremely tight offside calls (e.g. for a toe or fingertip), inconsistent application across competitions, subjective interpretation of handball incidents, and the psychological impact on players and fans. Many argue VAR is being used beyond its original purpose of correcting “clear and obvious errors.”
Q3. How has VAR affected betting on football matches?
VAR has introduced new uncertainties for punters, especially for live betting. Market suspensions during reviews, which can last 45-87% of check durations, disrupt betting flows. Odds can shift dramatically after VAR decisions, and some traditional betting patterns have been altered. Voided bets and settlement disputes have also increased.
Q4. Are there any proposed changes to improve the VAR system?
Some suggestions include introducing tolerance margins for offside calls, limiting handball penalties to clear instances of advantage gained, allowing teams to challenge decisions like in other sports, and refining the “clear and obvious error” threshold. However, finding consensus on rule changes remains challenging.
Q5. Has VAR achieved its goal of making football fairer and more accurate?
While VAR has increased decision accuracy in some areas, opinions are divided on whether it has made the game fairer overall. It has eliminated some clear errors but introduced new controversies around marginal calls. The technology’s impact on the spirit and flow of the game remains a subject of ongoing debate among fans, players, and officials.